Friday, August 21, 2020

Sidekick Contribute to a Story

Paper Example How Companion/Sidekick Contribute to a Story Paper Example: How Companion/Sidekick Contribute to a Story A sidekick also known as a companion is a subsidiary in a story. Sidekicks provide various functions in a story. One of the major functions of a sidekick is being the hero’s counterpoint. Sidekicks are also beneficial in alternating points the view of a story. In this case, the counterpoint provides skills, knowledge, or just anything that a story fails to tackle. Sidekicks give a story the comic relief effect or in most cases, the straight man to a particular hero’s comedic actions. Having a companion or a sidekick in a story is important because the sidekick generally acts as an individual whom the audience can easily relate with better than the hero. In this case, the targeted audience can picture or imagine themselves as the sidekicks. Companions or sidekicks give a story an emotional connection particularly when the story’s hero is portrayed as distant or detached. These traits normally generate difficulty in ensuring the audience like the hero. Sidekicks are often the int imate of who is aware of the hero or the main character better than other audiences are. In this case, sidekicks give the audience a credible motive to like the main character or hero in a story. In Gilgamesh, a great literature masterpiece, the aspect of sidekicks and companions are commonly used throughout the story to alter the viewpoints of narration. Gilgamesh himself is one of the villains in the Gilgamesh story. In this story, the audience sees Gilgamesh as the only sidekick who has his own sidekick. Gilgamesh portrays a bad character in the story and in this case, a great sidekick. From the story, when Gilgamesh is beaten, he gets to make use of him as an esper. The context reflects Gilgamesh as a historical figure since the existence of the scripts. This verifies the existence of various figures associated with him. This aspect truly reflects the sidekick aspect in a story. Although Gilgamesh was a complicated person, his friendship with Enkidu convinces the context readers that Gilgemesh is a good person. Gilgemesh’s historical figure is linked to the taciturn character in the story. This aspect reveals the physical condition, feelings and thoughts of the people as well as various elements in the story. However, in some parts of the story, this aspect is reversed. In contrast, Enkindu closely brings out the aspect of sidekick in the story with his ability to help Gilgemesh from time to time. In the story, Enkindu gives the story the comic relief effect. He is the straight man to Gilgemesh comedic actions. Utnapishtum is also another character who is seen as a sidekick in the context. Utnapishtum acts as a person whom the audience can relate to more easily compared to Gilgemesh. In some incidents, Utnapishtum is better than Gilgemesh who is the real hero of the story. Here, Utnapishtum plays an important role to both the context and to the audience in general. His role can make the targeted audience picture themselves as sidekicks in the story. Utnapishtum gives the audience an emoti onal connection and in places where Gilgemesh is distant. At one point, Gilgamesh is against Utnapishtim in the underworld; hence, he is seeking out Utnapishtim. The aspect of Utnapishtim being a sidekick comes in when he survives the mythological flood. It is at this point that the hero himself turns to consult with him about secrets to immortality. In reality, Gilgamesh is afraid of death hence he wants to learn immortality secrets. The context also brings him out as a sound man who escaped death having preserved animal and human life in the boat that he built. In the same context, Utnapishtim directs Gilgamesh to a certain plant, which they believe it will renew his youth. At this point, Gilgamesh fails to come back with it to his home. From this evidence, we can categorically attest that Utnapishtim was somehow more of a hero than Gilgamesh was. He clearly brings out the aspect of a true sidekick, which the audience would love to see. In Gilgamesh, the sidekick aspect has been used to intimate of who knows the real hero of the story. In this case, the story highlights Gilgamesh as the main character of the story better than how other audiences are. Through the sidekick aspect, the audiences get a credible motive to relate with the hero of the story. The context brings out many sidekicks that are used for humorous relief. Alternatively, the context brings out other companions who are not outrageous as compared to the real heroes. Some of the comic reliefs that the context brings out can often be improved by the reactions and the presence of the sidekicks in the Gilgemesh context. From the Gilgamesh context, one can easily attest that Utnapishtim is physically capable than the real hero in the context. This aspect shows Utnapishtim as an intellectual person contrasted to Gilgemesh.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.